Movie Reviews Roger Ebert Got Really Wrong

Movie Reviews Roger Ebert Got Really Wrong


November 27, 2024 | Jesse Singer

Movie Reviews Roger Ebert Got Really Wrong


Everyone Makes Mistakes

Roger Ebert was more than just a guy with a thumb. He was a smart, thoughtful and excellent film critic—the most famous film critic there has ever been, as well as the first film critic to win the Pulitzer Prize for Criticism. But, as the old adage goes: Everyone makes mistakes. And even the great Roger Ebert wasn't immune to getting things wrong. As he did with his critiques of these films...

Star Wars: Episode I - The Phantom Menace (1999): 3.5 Stars

It's arguably the worst Star Wars movie ever made. And yet, there was Roger Ebert giving it 3.5 out of 4 stars. The force (of being wrong) was strong with him that day.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace (1999)Lucasfilm, Star Wars: Episode I – The Phantom Menace (1999)

Advertisement

Fight Club (1999): 2 Stars

It's true that Fight Club wasn't a big hit with audiences or critics when it first came out in 1999—and it took a little time for people to find it and see both its critical and commercial appreciation to develop into the acclaimed movie it is today. But Roger Ebert never came around on it.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Fight Club (1999)Twentieth Century, Fight Club (1999)

Advertisement

Paul Blart: Mall Cop (2009): 3 Stars

Kevin James is funny. Paul Blart: Mall Cop isn't! The film is wholly deserving of its 34% score on Rotten Tomatoes. But if you were wondering who one of those 34% are that liked it... one of them was Roger Ebert.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Paul Blart: Mall Cop (2009)Columbia, Paul Blart: Mall Cop (2009)

Advertisement

Gladiator (2000): 2 Stars

Ebert called it "Rocky on downers" and said it lacked any real entertainment value. Say it with us: Roger Ebert, are you not entertained?!

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Gladiator (2000)DreamWorks, Gladiator (2000)

Advertisement

A Clockwork Orange (1971): 2 Stars

To say that Roger Ebert didn't like this film is an understatement. In fact, based on what he wrote in his review, two stars seems like too many. "An ideological mess", "talky and boring". Yes, the film is controversial. And yes, it was misread by some as simply a pure celebration of violence. But we're surprised that as the years went on, Ebert never came back to the film and adjusted his review in appreciation of this one of Kubrick's many masterpieces.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film A Clockwork Orange (1971)Warner Bros., A Clockwork Orange (1971)

Advertisement

Speed 2: Cruise Control (1997): 3 Stars

Ebert said, of this lame sequel, "Movies like this embrace goofiness with an almost sensual pleasure. And so, on a warm summer evening, do I". While he was wrong about this movie, thankfully he gave the first Speed film a higher rating of 4 out of 4 stars—so, at least he knew which one was better.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Speed 2: Cruise Control (1997)Twentieth Century, Speed 2: Cruise Control (1997)

Advertisement

Green Lantern (2011): 2.5 Stars

While 2.5 stars isn't high praise, it's a lot more praise than this movie deserved. And we're not alone in that feeling. Even the director Martin Campbell has said that "The film did not work". 

But not only did Ebert not hate Green Lantern, he liked it more than... Thor.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Green Lantern (2011)Warner Bros., Green Lantern (2011)

Advertisement

Thor (2011): 1.5 Stars

He said it right there in his Green Lantern review: "I liked it more than Thor". 

Now, we aren't going to try and argue that Thor was a great movie—or even a great superhero movie. But it was definitely better than Green Lantern. In fact, as far as we see it, the scores Ebert gave the two films need to just be flipped, and everything would be pretty okay.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Thor (2011)Marvel, Thor (2011)

Advertisement

Daredevil (2003): 3 Stars

Ebert's appreciation for bad superhero movies was also evident in 2003, when he called Daredevil "actually pretty good"—and gave it three stars. Yes, three!

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Daredevil (2003)Twentieth Century, Daredevil (2003)

Advertisement

Beetlejuice (1988): 2 Stars

We'll never know what he would've thought about the recent sequel, but we do know that he thought the first one was all "about gimmicks, not characters". This might surprise some, but when it came to Tim Burton films—Ebert was wrong about a bunch of them.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Beetlejuice (1988)Warner Bros., Beetlejuice (1988)

Advertisement

Edward Scissorhands (1990): 2 Stars

While Ebert praised Tim Burton's striving to give us things that we've never seen before, he also felt that ,"Burton has not yet found the storytelling and character-building strength to go along with his pictorial flair". And according to Ebert, Edward Scissorhands was yet another example of that.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Edward Scissorhands (1990)Twentieth Century, Edward Scissorhands (1990)

Advertisement

Batman (1989): 2 Stars

Ebert called it "a triumph of design over story, style over substance". Sorry Ebert—Tim Burton's OG Batman movie was style AND substance. But what about the sequel?

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Batman (1989)Warner Bros., Batman (1989)

Advertisement

Batman Returns (1992): 2 Stars

Nope. Ebert didn't like this one either: "There is no doubt Burton is a gifted director, but is he the right director for Batman?" Yes, Ebert. He is!

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Batman Returns (1992)Warner Bros., Batman Returns (1992)

Advertisement

The Usual Suspects (1995): 1.5 Stars

This movie confused Ebert and "To the degree that I do understand," he wrote, "I don’t care". He even went so far as to put this great film on his "Most Hated" list.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film The Usual Suspects (1995)PolyGram, The Usual Suspects (1995)

Advertisement

Napoleon Dynamite (2004): 1.5 Stars

Looks like Ebert wasn't going to be voting for Pedro (unless Pedro also hated the movie).

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Napoleon Dynamite (2004)Paramount, Napoleon Dynamite (2004)

Advertisement

Home Alone (1990): 2.5 Stars

Ebert wasn't a fan of the first two Home Alone films. He gave the second one two stars—which is arguably accurate. But what isn't accurate is the 2.5 he gave the first one—calling it "so implausible that it makes it hard" to care about what happens to Kevin.

Apparently the third film was much more believable though...

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Home Alone (1990)Twentieth Century, Home Alone (1990)

Advertisement

Home Alone 3 (1997): 3 Stars

Yup, Ebert finally came around to the series once Macaulay Culkin and director Chris Columbus left–saying the third film was "fresh, very funny, and better than the first two". We will now all put our hands to our cheeks in collective shock.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Home Alone 3 (1997)Twentieth Century, Home Alone 3 (1997)

Advertisement

Godzilla (1954): 1.5 Stars

While some people might argue that the first Godzilla film is the greatest monster movie of all time, Roger Ebert was not one of those people. To quote his review: Godzilla is "a bad movie".

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Godzilla (1954)Toho, Godzilla (1954)

Advertisement

Pink Flamingos (1972): 0 Stars

Okay, so we kinda get it. We can appreciate that John Waters' gross-out-bad-taste cult classic isn't for everyone. In fact, it probably isn't for most people. But zero stars?

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Pink Flamingos (1972)New Line, Pink Flamingos (1972)

Advertisement

The Elephant Man (1980): 2 Stars

Often mentioned as one of David Lynch's best films, Ebert called it "shallow" and "pure sentimentalism". And while we're talking about Lynch...

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film The Elephant Man (1980)Columbia, The Elephant Man (1980)

Advertisement

Blue Velvet (1986): 1 Star

It's quite possibly Lynch's best and most enduring film. Yet Ebert said that it "pulled so violently in opposite directions that it [pulled] itself apart".

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Blue Velvet (1986)De Laurentiis, Blue Velvet (1986)

Advertisement

Raising Arizona (1987): 1.5 Stars

This underrated Coen Brothers film was underrated by Roger Ebert.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Raising Arizona (1987)Twentieth Century, Raising Arizona (1987)

Advertisement

Fast Times At Ridgemont High (1982): 1 Star

Ebert called the filmmakers of Fast Times at Ridgemont High "tone-deaf". Looks like he was the tone-deaf one this time.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Fast Times at Ridgemont High (1982)Universal, Fast Times at Ridgemont High (1982)

Advertisement

Taste Of Cherry (1997): 1 Stars

The Iranian drama has an 83% on Rotten Tomatoes and has been hailed by some critics as one of the best films of the 90s. But Roger Ebert was definitely not one of those critics. Ebert called the film, "excruciatingly boring".

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Taste of Cherry (1997)Kanoon, Taste of Cherry (1997)

Advertisement

Cop And A Half (1993): 3 Stars

For those who might not remember this 1993 cop-and-a-kid comedy starring Burt Reynolds... it wasn't good. Even if you wanted to call it "sunny and good-hearted"—as Ebert did, you shouldn't then go and call it a 3 out of 4 star movie—as Ebert also did. Even his partner in "thumbs", Gene Siskel, called Ebert out on his review of this one (Siskel eventually put the film at the top of his "Worst of the Year" list).

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Cop and a Half (1993)Universal, Cop and a Half (1993)

Advertisement

Dead Poets Society (1989): 2 Stars

"When [Williams’] students stood on their desks to protest his dismissal, I was so moved, I wanted to throw up". We're not sure what makes us cry more—that scene, or Ebert's unflattering take on it.

A visually captivating still taken from a pivotal moment in the film Dead Poets Society (1989)Touchstone, Dead Poets Society (1989)

Advertisement

READ MORE

Disneyscandal Internal
August 9, 2024 Eul Basa

Disney Channel Stars’ Biggest Scandals

Disney Channel stars, usually seen as positive influences for kids, have faced scandals. Former Disney actors have made headlines for various negative issues, showing the challenges of childhood fame.
Rotten100 Internal
June 14, 2024 Eul Basa

Movies That Got 100% On Rotten Tomatoes

If you're a true movie-lover, you know about Rotten Tomatoes. It's a popular website where both movies and TV shows are heavily scrutinized by critics and audiences alike, and each piece of work is given a "Tomatometer" score based on a percentage of positive reviews. Rare is it for a movie to get a perfect score—so when a movie does manage to achieve a 100% rating, it must mean it has something special to offer.
Edie Sedgwick Facts
July 9, 2024 Kyle Climans

Cool Facts About Edie Sedgwick, The Tragic It Girl Of The 60s

Edie Sedgwick acted as muse (or lover) to countless artists and musicians who passed through New York before her death—but few know her even darker history.
Ursula Andress Facts
July 9, 2024 Rebecca Wong

Beautiful Facts About Ursula Andress, The Original Bond Girl

Known as one of the most prominent beauties of the 1960s, Ursula Andress managed to wield her looks like a weapon to carve her way through the world of movie-making. Her gorgeous, unforgettable scene in Dr. No may have made her famous, but she’s definitely more than just a pretty face. Behind the scenes, few movie stars can boast a life as unforgettable as Ursula Andress.
George C. Scott Facts
July 9, 2024 Claire Ng

Intimidating Facts About George C. Scott, The Most Difficult Man In Hollywood

Behind the scenes, George C. Scott was as complex—and even more volatile—as the characters he played on screen and on the stage.
Jean Spangler Facts
July 9, 2024 Brendan Da Costa

Mysterious Facts About Jean Spangler, Hollywood’s Missing Starlet

Jean Spangler was on the verge on stardom when she mysteriously disappeared. One of the only clues uncovered was a single, cryptic note.